Yesterday was just one of those days…I do seem to be getting a lot of those at the moment. Today it is back to the easel and paint, paint, paint. This is the start of another painting in the Grey series – I wonder how this will work out?
Yesterday was just one of those days…I do seem to be getting a lot of those at the moment. Today it is back to the easel and paint, paint, paint. This is the start of another painting in the Grey series – I wonder how this will work out?
Yesterday I outlined a possible timetable up to the end of 2014 should Scotland vote yes. As with any speculation it was just that with huge gaps in it because of a lack of knowledge. However, already somethings I speculated about have started to come true. Firstly, and hardly surprisingly, the big beast of Scottish Finance have indicated if there is a yes vote they will be heading south across the border. What this actually means is unclear at the moment but should there continue to be currency uncertainty then it well lead to job losses in Scotland. The size and scale is unknown.
The secondly the cracks on the Yes side started to show. In the event of a yes vote then Alex Salmond believes he will have a negotiating team ready within a week. However, the Scottish Green Party, part of the Yes campaing, have indicated that their view of a future Scotland is diametrically opposed to Salmond’s – how this can be overcome in seven days after the Yes vote I do not know – one of the many issues where there is uncertainty.
Whether this means the rest of what I said is right or near right is a very moot point and I guess history will be the judge of that.
So the first three months of 2015. This assumes one crucial thing – that the current government has resisted it’s own contradictions and kept going – given the problems facing the two nations this is probably the most likely result.
In January the first real negotiations will start to take place. The run up to the end of 2014 would have been full of posturing and sizing each other up. There are two key decisions that will probably shape the whole of what is to come.
The first is money. At the moment the UK has said that should Scotland vote yes then they will have to come up with a new currency arrangement as they cannot continue to use the pound. This has been dismissed by the Yes side as scaremongering as it is in both sides best interest for the current situation to carry on. I cannot see that there is any chance that Scotland can continue to use the pound in it’s current way – as part of a wider currency union. The yes side have countered that if they aren’t allowed to do so then they will renege on taking a fare share of the national debt. This again is unlikely to happen as it would mean that the new country would start out as a defaulter country with no currency. Both positions are bonkers. I suspect there would be some form of agreement sort that is some form of middle road. Whether it could be sold to a now very distrustful House of Commons is another matter.
The second big decision is defence. This is not the abstract argument over Trident or the absurdity of just saying that Scotland should have 12 Typhoon jets without any real idea who will fly/support such planes. None of these things will matter a jot because there is one decision that has the potential the wreck everything – where will the new class of navel destroyers be built? At the moment they are planned to be built in Glasgow which, currently, is part of the UK. However, if Scotland votes Yes then Glasgow will be a foreign country and the Royal Navy doesn’t build warship in a foreign country. What this demonstrates more than anything else is that in a Cold War situation, which the Navy still is in, new ships are not really about defence but rather about subsidising well paid jobs. To add extra complexity to all this there are an awful lot of marginal seats in and around former navel ship yards in England which would gratefully receive the billions of pounds of investment that would come should they be asked to build the new ships. I cannot see the ships being built in Scotland for two reasons.
Firstly the UK government will have no control over the political landscape into which these ships are being built. I will give you an example – earlier I mentioned about the Greens and their divergent views with the main SNP. They have very clear views about defence spending which is not very positive, especially where nuclear weapons are concerned. Now should they form part of a new Scottish Government in 2016 how will this effect the building of war ships for a foreign power? A foreign power which still keeps its nuclear weapons in Scotland – suddenly the new warships being built on the Clyde could be an extra negotiating tool to get those Nuclear weapons out sooner rather than later. Is this likely? I don’t know but it is just one of the scenarios that make building war ships in a foreign country fraught with problems – just ask the Russians and their new aircraft carriers being build in France.
Secondly, there is an election due in 2015 for the whole of the UK – how could any party resist calls for defence spending to go to deprived former navel dock yards in the UK not a foreign country – Scotland?
The result of all this is that the ship building industry on the River Clyde would finally be killed off with the loss of thousands of jobs. Exactly how this dynamic will feed into the negotiations is impossible to say but I can’t see it being very beneficial and remember there are many solid Labour UK parliamentary constituencies in the Strathclyde region as well as Lothian – all would be directly effected by this closure. Even more complexities to add to an already complex situation
Of course this decision could well be put off until after the 2015 elections but that is just making matters worse as it would increase the instability and distrust in any negotiation. Whatever happens this has the potential the derail any negotiations for months.
So by the time of the 2015 election we could be facing a real breakdown in relations between the UK and Scotland which could well be voiced in the elections – with gains for the SNP at the expense of Labour, thus wrecking any chance of a Labour forming the new government in the truncated 2015 – 2016 parliament. Equally, UKIP will be only too willing to play the English card in their campaigning which may also destroy the Conservative’s chances. In short this will probably lead to a weak coalition government facing a more belligerent SNP – things could go very wrong and both sides will be the losers.
Having reread this I realise that it is very negative but given the heightened emotions that are running around at the moment I don’t believe it is totally out the question. Of course should Alex Salmond win the vote he might turn into some fair minded reasonable person who is willing to compromise. Viewed from south of the border that doesn’t appear to be the Alex Salmond I have come to know – hence the pessimistic view. I just hope and pray I’m wrong – so very wrong about all this.
Simon Marchini
http://www.simonmarchini.co.uk
Lethargy is a curse I suffer from time to time and can be herald of much worse – I hope it doesn’t this time and I think it won’t. Which makes me wonder why I made this little doodle of Woody Allen.
So St Gordon is to come to the rescue on his greying charger. “…Once more unto the breach…” he seems to be saying and he alone is going to save the Union of Scotland and the UK. I’m really not sure who is more patronised by all this more? The Scots or the rest of us. Here we have the least successful PM in living memory standing up, as bold as brass, wrapping himself in the Union flag, and saying trust me I’m Gordo. As with all of Gordon Brown’s great plans in the past his timescale to Home Rule for the Scots is falling apart before he has bothered to sit down. Today we hear rumbling’s from English MP’s about no one has spoken to them about all this and how is all this going to effect their constituents? After all many of these MP’s may be fight the forth coming election, whenever it might be, against a UKIP insurgency who will love to exploit any deal done with Scotland as a bad deal for England. Nice one Gordon.
So, if this whole thing back fires or that Miliband or Cameron make some almighty mess of things today as they tour Scotland like some papal missionary trying to convert the heathens to the joys of unionism and the Scots vote Yes – then what? What is the timetable after that? I have blogged about the impossibility of the supposed 18 months to independence and I still believe that. However, no matter what is the likely date there are certain things that are likely to happen over the next 6 to 9 months. This is my first stab at trying to imagine what the first 3 months might be.
Within a week of the vote there will be a purge of the Government of all Scottish ministers. This won’t be too problematic for the Conservatives but it will hit the Lib Dems much harder. No matter all the Scottish ministers will be gone. The same things will happen on the Labour side which will cause greater problems but problems that they can get around.
It is also likely that in that week there may well be a run on the pound as speculators test the boundaries of how much the currency will fall. However, this probably will be a short term thing and the currency markets will settle down after the first flush of activity. However, we might see that interest rates will have to be raised to defend the pound which should see how strong the recovery really is. Shortly after this the great Scottish banks will admit the invertible and move their HQ’s to London. This will mean that much of their debt will also move from Scotland which probably wouldn’t harm things either – although expect some stamping of feet north of the border. There is also the first real test of the real temperature when the Ryder Cup is played at Gleneagles between the USA and EU golf players. If this turns into a Scotland the brave show then this might have much broader implications than just the golf. I hope it doesn’t but in the heightened atmosphere of the post referendum vote who knows. A lot depends on the statesmanship of Alex Salmond.
By the end of September all of the contingency plans that currently do not exist in Whitehall will start to appear. They may well be thread bare but will be the starting point for the negotiations to come. They will also be the starting point to measure of the feeling of the people who live in UK – just how hurt do they feel about the whole thing and who do they blame. This is when David Cameron will start to get into all sorts of trouble – especially from his right wing. If he falls then there is a good chance that his Government will fall then this will lead to early elections – which possibly won’t be such a bad thing given the whole mess he has lead the country to. The election will have one theme – just how much do you give the Scots and could become very ugly indeed.
By October senior civil servants from the UK and Scotland will have held meetings to start to flesh out the agenda for the negotiations. I guess the first things to sort out is just what points there are not contentious. This may well be a very small list but it is a start. For me I guess the one thing that they all can agree on is that Scotland will be part of NATO. They might also agree that the Royal Regiment of Scotland should form the core of the new land forces for Scotland. Whatever the result of the these contacts are (this may already have taken place and agreed in principle) they will have to report back to the political master who have to make the final decision – which of course might be a problem if Cameron has fallen and an early election is called. One of the more thorny problems to be identify in this period would be who actually negotiates for Scotland on the International stage? Would the Scots accept the good offices of the Foreign Office who, after all, have all the contacts with the EU, UN, World Bank, NATO et al. It would seem sensible but don’t expect such things to be plain sailing.
By November then there is the little case of a Scotland v England football match taking place in Glasgow at Celtic Park. This is fraught at the best of times but if feelings are running high between the two countries then it might be worth while cancelling the match. It should also be remembered Celtic is identified as the Irish Nationalist team which might just cause extra tension. Also by this time the contradictions on the Scottish side will start appear. The SNP is a rainbow coalition of groups who are held together by the hope of independence and so these disparate voices will want to be heard in any negotiations. On top of this you have all these soon to be out of work Westminster based Scottish politicians who will want to try and make a new career north of the border who may well want have their say on the shape of a new Scotland – don’t discount St Gordon making a big play for the leadership of the Scottish labour party. Whatever happens the smug smile of Alex Salmond might not look so smug by the end of November as he faces his own political difficulties. British participation in any American lead attack on ISIS will cease as their is unlikely to be any support in Parliament for it. This is also the case for any negotiations with the EU over the role of Britain as their won’t be a Britain in the less than 18 months. In short, for the first time in an awful long time the British guns will be silent and we will have no voice in the world – silence is golden.
By December the negotiating lines will start to be established and hopefully by Christmas there will be peace on the northern front as sane council will have prevailed because the New Year is going to one hell of a ride. Of course none of this takes into account “..events dear boy events..” or perhaps a much better quote would be the “…unknowable unknowables…” Here are just a taste, a nuclear accident in the Scottish nuclear power station, a major fire at Grangemouth refinery, some form of major sectarian problems in Northern Ireland as a result of the Scottish vote. None of these are likely but should they happen – then who knows how it will effect things.
I really do hope the Scots know what they are really voting for – not the brigadoon of Alex Salmond’s imagination but a hard, chilling slog to a new, perhaps not better, country who will always be influenced by the comparatively huge country to the south. It ain’t going to be easy to forge this new Scotland but should they vote Yes then this is the road they are setting out on. I hope and prey that sane voices on both sides prevail – I’m not sure they will.
Simon Marchini
www.simonmarchini.co.uk
I have just finished reading my morning paper, The Times BTW, and it would seem that all hell is happening. Not the horror that is the Middle East, no much worse. It seems that the Scots might actually vote for indpendence so apparently yesterday the financial markets were in turmoil, melt down, panic, crisis… . Now this is strange when we have just lived through real financial crisis and melt down – this doesn’t feel like that.
The problem with all this is that it makes everything too easy to dismiss – although I’m not too sure what The Times readership is north of the border, and yes that isn’t Hadrian’s Wall. There will be consequences of independence, some not too pleasant, but if the Scot’s wish to go then let them go. However, as I have said before, I really don’t think things are going to be plain sailing between Scotland and well let’s be honest about this – England should they go it alone, but we will all survive.
Another equally hyperventilated event takes place today – a Utah based tech company announces a new product. Apparently people have already started to queue up to buy this new phone outside the New York store of the company – don’t these people have something better to do with their lives – jobs perhaps? Yes today is the iPhone 6, or whatever they are going to call it, launch. We can expect the usual nonsense from the tech blogs as to why this won’t work or why that wasn’t included when Samsung et al have included it. Frankly I am now very bored by the whole thing. The new phone will be, at best, an iteration on the current model. It won’t be ground breaking or revolutionary but rather a bit better than the previous model. Perhaps the more interesting launch will take place a few weeks time with the new iPad. Here the question that Apple have to address is how to keep a separation at the bottom end between the iPhone, assuming Apple launch an iPhone Max, and at the top end with the MacBook Air? Just where is the iPad going will be the more challenging problem for Apple.
So hyperventilation appears to be the order of the day – I’m glad I’m off out today and won’t be able follow any of this – that is unless I check Twitter but that will be my fault and I have just warned myself!
Simon Marchini
http://www.simonmarchini.co.uk
One of the problems of learning on the job is that your mistakes are really magnified. This is the latest iteration of the a painting I’m calling Gene Gray. I have been working on it for three days now and I have made a huge amount of mistakes along the way. She is starting to brome an interesting painting and I have spent an awful lot of time thinking about how to correct some of the mistakes – I guess that is the story of my life, perhaps everyone’s?
I have also decide to alter things in photoshop to try and give me idea where to take the painting and I have got some intresting new ideas. How said life was easy?
Behind those hazel eyes… maybe
Given much of the contents of Tate Modern I thought this approach was rather fitting. Again, it shows the creative aspects that are available if you push the Pano function outside its comfort zone.
Over the next couple of weeks I think I will be thinking Grey. Those who know know why.
It’s in your eyes